Possibly Helpful Advice

Finding your way after leaving the cult of Scientology


Clear Wallet Cert


Motti Morel points out that donations are the lifeblood of the new Church of Miscavige and it was only a matter of time before the church, in all of its wisdom, devised a scheme to ensure continuing donations even when the spirit of self sacrifice falters and thoughts of individual survival emerge.



MCO Bulletin of August 12nd, 2014


Chief MAA FSO.

Security Officer Freewinds

MAA Freewinds

All RTC Reps
External Security Chief OSA INT
External Security Sits Handling Off OSA INT

IAS Chief

Reg hat

C/S Hat

LRH Comm


Historical Background

In the development of the technology of Scientology, Ron tapped into the vast resources of ancient wisdom. He isolated the workable elements, scrubbed away false data and then perfected and streamlined the processes to create the technology we have today.

Such is the case with Confessionals. Enacted in the 13th century by the Catholic Church1, the parishioner would confess his transgressions to an ordained Minister in solitude. The content of the confession would remain confidential between the parishioner and his minister.

Ron perfected this very valuable tech to stress the element of RESPONSIBILITY on the part of the pc. And with the advent of the E-Meter, it became possible for the first time in history to really clean every corner of the overt act and withhold to achieve alleviation of the burden and freedom from the bank.

After the confessional is completed and attested to, one additional step is required: The complete ending of the cycle. A real, concrete, measurable atonement for the sin that would leave the parishioner feeling he has not only unburdened himself, but completely made up the damage and ended cycle on it, thus enabling him to open a new leaf.

The Catholic Church recognized the importance of this step and developed it gradually: In the 13th century these atonements included acts of mercy, pilgrimages, prayers and flagellation. These were transformed in the 14th and 15th centuries into actual financial donations, called INDULGENCIAE. Donation of money is real, concrete and measurable and most importantly – immediate, thus enabling the sinner to promptly end cycle on his sin, rather than having to wait for completion of a pilgrimage or other lengthy procedures.

INDULGENCIAE replaced older, more tedious forms of atonement such as fasting, flagellations and burning at the stake and therefore became vastly popular with the parishioners. So popular, in fact, that a slogan was coined and recited repeatedly at every corner throughout the middle ages:

As soon as the coin in the coffer rings,
The soul from purgatory springs

In our technology, this principle is stated clearly enough in step 3 of Liability formula: Make up the damage one has done by personal contribution far beyond the ordinary demands of a group member.


The Problem

But, as LRH said in HCO PL 3 December 1971, EXCHANGE, “money is a passionate subject”. While most Scientologists willingly paid their donations and proceeded happily on the bridge, there were still those who, when approached by IAS, Ideal Org, Library project or any Church fundraisers, displayed CI’s, BI’s and HE&R. These resulted in ARC breaks and enturbulation which called for further disciplinary actions in ethics, and thus slowed one’s progress on the bridge. In extreme cases, when all measures of rehabilitation failed, it even led to SP declares and expulsion.

This was a non-optimum situation. A breakthrough was needed to quell these rifts so that the number of SP declares could be cut down and more Scientologists would retain their good standing and not be denied their spiritual eternity.

I’m happy to announce that this breakthrough has been attained.

The Solution

It is called The Refusal to Donate Rundown, or RDRD in short.

The Rundown

RDRD is divided into three sections:

  1. Indoctrination

  2. Removing barriers

  3. Training on acquiring money for donations

The first section, INDOCTRINATION, is done in session. It includes Method 1 and Method 2 word clearing on the subjects of money, exchange, Ethics, the Conditions of Existence and critical thoughts about Dear Leader and International Management.

Method 1 is an auditing procedure used to clear up bypassed charge associated with all misunderstood words from all of life prior to the procedure. Basically the auditor assesses (reads out) a list of subjects and then takes the ones that read (have a response on the E-meter) and directs the person to find the words he didn’t understand. This is done until the person has a floating needle throughout the list.

In Method 2 the pc is reading out loud while on the E-meter. This procedure is one that is supposed to A) find any word the pc has charge on from not understanding and clear them up and 2) find any words not understood as shown by the person not being able to read the material perfectly. Method 2 is delivered after Method 1.

The second section, REMOVING BARRIERS, is also done in session. The process is tailor-made for the individual pc or pre-OT by the C/S in order to address any and all disagreements, considerations and false data on the subject of donations the person may have. After the lists are completed, the pc undergoes a comprehensive Security Check to ensure that nothing was overlooked and that he is now clean as a whistle.

The third section, TRAINING ON ACQUIRING MONEY FOR DONATIONS is done in the Academy by the student from a course pack of the same name. It teaches the student all the ways to extend his credit card limits and acquire additional credit limits, taking a second mortgage on his house and other real-estate assets, deferring loan payments, evading creditors, persuading old relatives to bequeath their wealth to the student in their last will, embezzling funds for the greatest good and other useful ways to acquire money for donations. The student star-rates on all materials and graduates after passing an exam with 100% success.

The action is completed when the pc has paid his donations in full, as demanded, with VGI’s and no HE&R, and has attested to the state of Clear Wallet.


The RDRD can be delivered at any point on the bridge, even in the middle of any other action. It takes precedence over every other action, as without it, no progress can be made on the bridge.

Pilots of RDRD conducted on resistive cases and RPF inmates proved spectacularly successful and salvaged countless thetans from eternal damnation.

The RDRD is a powerful tool to remove every last barrier to the Church’s financial expansion. It will be delivered standardly in Orgs of all classes.

Clear Wallet, Clear Mind.

David Miscavige

Most benevolent Leader



1 . The Fourth Council of the Lateran was convoked by Pope Innocent III with the papal bull of April 19, 1213, and the Council gathered at Rome’s Lateran Palace beginning November 11, 1215.

Canon 21 from the Fourth Council, the famous “Omnis utriusque sexus”, which commands every Christian who has reached the years of discretion to confess all his, or her, sins at least once a year to his, or her, own (i.e. parish) priest. 

2 . This slogan was coined by Johann Tetzel (1465 – 11 August 1519) a Roman Catholic German Dominican friar and preacher. He later became the Grand Commissioner for indulgenciae in Germany.

Number of views:56628

An Eyewitness Account of David Miscavige “Coaching” a GAT Auditor

beatingsGwyneth Rolph has returned to share one of the most intriguing stories I have ever seen about the person who currently manages the Church of Scientology. Once you read this, you will have no doubt about the future of this organization.

DM and his GAT Drill

It was October 2004, during the few days running up to the IAS event. I was on my Supervisor internship at Saint Hill.

DM and his entourage were in town for the event – we TTC’ers knew this, because we had all had to find alternative accommodation in East Grinstead so that DM and company could take over the Sea Org boarding house were we had been staying while on training.

For several days now, all the staff and public at Saint Hill had been anticipating a drop-in visit by DM. There had been an intense call-in campaign to get anyone and everyone to come in on course during the days leading up to the event, so that should DM or any of his staff walk into the course rooms, they would see the place (uncharacteristically) bursting at the seams.

I spent quite a lot of time studying or drilling in the Internship over those few days, as bizarrely there had been an order that there were to be no sup Interns in the course rooms when or if DM visited. (I have no idea what policy this was based on.) So some course periods I would be making progress on my checksheet, and other times I would have to make myself scarce. It was a bit frustrating.

Late one evening after course, I had some admin to complete, and I went down to the Internship to sit there and finish it.

An auditor called Eoin, whom I remember as an outer org trainee from Dublin a few years ago, was now a member of Snr. HCO and was apparently on his NED internship. He was watching one of his session videos on the TV in the corner.

Standing watching over his shoulder was a fairly short man in a smart suit. Two female CMO members stood either side of him. At first I didn’t recognize him, because from my perspective as I walked in the door, he was standing sideways on. He was saying loudly and repeatedly to this guy, “You know you’re going to get roasted, don’t you?”

I sat down and got on with my work, but the chewing out continued.

On the video, I heard the auditor’s voice call an F/N. I couldn’t see the TV screen from where I was seated, and I have no idea whether the auditor was correctly calling reads and F/Ns or not, but obviously this one prompted some disagreement.

“Oh, my GOD!” bellowed DM. “What do you call that?”

A few more seconds of video.

“Do you call yourself an auditor? What are you?” DM thundered.

“I’m an intern, Sir,” the auditor replied weakly.

“We’re going to do a little Golden Age of Tech drill, right now,” DM ordered, dragging the auditor over to the middle of the room and pulling up two chairs. Seating the auditor in one and sitting down himself in the chair opposite, he ordered his lackeys to fetch a pile of tech volumes off the shelves.

“This is what it is like for the pc when you do that,” he said.

Picking up a pile of about three or four tech volumes, he slammed them down in the auditor’s lap, while demanding loudly, “Has a withhold been missed?” Then again, “Has a withhold been missed?” – SLAM – another pile of volumes. And again, “Has a withhold been missed?” – SLAM – in rapid succession. Finally, he produced a bottle of water from somewhere, chucked it in the auditor’s face, and yelled, “Your needle is floating!”

By this time, the Snr. Intern Sup and the Qual Sec, who had walked in to find out what all the shouting was about, were standing there staring, speechless.

“That was distilled water, so it won’t mark your clothing,” DM said to the auditor, as if that made it all right.

“Now, you’re going to do the same drill on the Qual Sec,” DM instructed.

The CMO lackeys scurried off with the bottle to refill it with water.

The Qual Sec sat in the chair while the auditor repeated the procedure on him with DM and his staff watching.

I kept my head down during this exchange and continued writing. DM, the CMO members, the auditor and Qual Sec left the room. I finished up and left the org for the evening.

The following lunchtime, one of the CMO members saw me and approached me in the corridor. “You were in the Internship last night, weren’t you?” she said. “Do you have any concerns about what you saw?”

I knew that this was a conversation I really did not want to have. “No,” I replied. “Why would I?”

The CMO girl was visibly relieved. “That’s good, that you have that viewpoint,” she said. “Well, if you have any questions, come and find me, OK?”

I never did find out what happened to the auditor.

This is an illustration of how dangerous it had become to be an auditor in the Church under DM.

In fact it illustrates how the Church had become such a dangerous environment that self-preservation was higher on our list of priorities than calling out-ethics and out-tech even when it occurred right in front of our very eyes.

This story therefore is my belated Knowledge Report.

Number of views:28205


Disconnection cuts theta lines One of our favorite correspondents has sent us another issue from the Miscavige Communications Office which should resolve once and for all whether the practice of Disconnection is aligned with Command Intention or not.

This spurious issue is marked Gen Non-Remimeo, but since it is of such importance, you who are outside the church should feel free to disseminate it freely.

If you post this satire elsewhere, please have the courtesy to acknowledge the author, Motti Morell.



MCO Policy Letter of August 6th, 2014

Gen Non-Remimeo
Exec Sec Hats
CO Sec Hat
C/S Hat
Legal Officer Hat
LRH Comm Hat


Despite the bad PR our disconnection policy has suffered from the growing hordes of squirrels, I can assure you that disconnection policy is our number one survival point.

A recent confidential poll conducted among Scientologists in good standing has shown conclusively that if disconnection was dropped as a policy, 78% of all Scientologists would walk out on the Church.

Independent Scientology is gnawing at our clientele with the lure of cheaper rates and softer ethics. Our saving grace is the fact that most Scientologists have family members, friends, employers, employees and business associates in the Church. Fear of disconnection keeps them within the fold. Most of them do not want to be separated forever from their loved ones, fired from their jobs, lose their businesses and their livelihood.

Furthermore, they do not want their loved ones to get into trouble, heavy ethics, Sec-Checks or have their bridge progress blocked.

So those 78% who are disaffected with the Church grit their teeth and keep their mouths shut and stay in. They don’t even share their thoughts with their closest relatives and friends for fear it will all come out in the confessionals with dire consequences to everyone involved.

I must commend those 78% for withholding their critical thoughts; Responsibility is ‘able to withhold’ (HCOB 21 Jan 1960, RESPONSIBILITY) and these individuals do it for the greatest good.

That’s why, with all the attacks we endure, we still manage to keep our membership and stream of donations waning at a moderate rate rather than crashing down at once. Had the disconnection policy been canceled, as a certain SP long since removed attempted it at one time in the past “in order to get good PR”, the Church of Scientology would have come plummeting to oblivion.

Therefore, the policy of disconnection is reaffirmed here with a vengeance, as it is just about the only glue that keeps us more or less intact.


David Miscavige

Most Glorious Leader


Number of views:19672

« Older Entries   Recent Entries »