A new contributor, Motti Morell, has taken an unconventional approach to understanding the possible source of Miscavige’s incredible desire for personal financial enhancement. He suggests that David is only following a time honored tradition of corruption that began with the Borgias. To give us some reality on this corruption, he has provided us with a short clip from the TV series, “The Borgias”. I think you will find his presentation persuasive…and chilling.
I watched the TV series “The Borgias” with Jeremy Irons. I edited the relevant excerpts from episodes 6 and 8 in season 3. Pope Alexander VI, Rodrigo Borgia, is regarded as the Catholic Church’s most corrupt and unscrupulous Pope.
LRH never agreed to donations except for actual services. But his successor who was born a Catholic, violently violated LRH policy and turned exchangeless donations into the COS’s main business.
It is most evident in Flag, where PC’s are requested to pay money not for services but for being allowed to advance on the bridge at all. Sins uncovered in confessionals can only be absolved by paying more money. When I refused to donate (after having fully paid for my services), I was driven out of my Oak Cove hotel room in the middle of the night and threatened with “losing my eternity”… Fuck them. Life has been much better outside ever since, in the indie world where LRH policy and tech is kept and not violated.
Interesting to see that DM didn’t invent anything; he just followed in a corrupt Pope’s footsteps… Some of my friends still inside see it but are afraid to sever their connections. Others refuse to see it for fear of unsettling their ‘stable datum’.
What kept me sane was my viewpoint from the start that I’m only in it for the tech, that the Organization is not the tech, that people (even Scientologists) are always imperfect, that greed and lust for power among humanoids (including Scientologists) is omniprevalent, that many unscrupulous, cynical leaders over the generations exploit their flock’s gullibility to extract money and obedience from them. All this has always been with the human race from the start, so why should it be different with the COS?
Number of views:15525
Here is another classic GAT adventure from Theodora Farnsworth. I am sure it will answer some of your questions about GAT auditing.
NOTHING could have prepared me for what I was about to experience. After years of training, I was about to go into session as a GAT auditor for the very first time.
Student Hat, Pro TRs, Upper Indoc TRs, Pro Metering and a good part of the Level Zero Course were behind me.
My twin and I had been drilling – and drilling and drilling and drilling – the procedure for flying ruds. The GAT drills were very thorough.
First you sat and said the commands to a wall until you could do it flawlessly from memory.
Next you did the “What do you do?” drills.
“You’ve just started the session. The PC’s needle isn’t floating. What do you do?” your twin droned at you. You had to respond instantly with the correct answer or get a “Flunk!”
Pages and pages and pages of questions like this. The whole drill was passed only when all the questions were answered perfectly, with no comm lag.
Then came the scripted GAT drills. Again, pages and pages of various scenarios all geared to train the student on the procedure for flying someone’s ruds.
You sat with your meter in front of you. The “PC” was a huge stuffed doll, sitting across from you. Your twin sat next to you, running the GAT simulator, an electronic device connected to your meter. By pressing various buttons on the simulator, your twin could make your meter display the reads called for by the GAT script.
You had to have your TRs in, operate the meter flawlessly, keep worksheets and control the session from start to finish. If you made one mistake and got a “Flunk!”, you had to keep going to the end of the drill and then start all over again. Only when you could get through the drill perfectly with no flunks were you given a “Pass!”
The final GAT drills allowed the coach to get creative. The drill book gave suggestions for scenarios but this time without a script. It was up to the coach to mock up what the “PC” was going to say and do and use the simulator to create appropriate needle reactions. When the student auditor demonstrated that he could handle all the situations listed in the drill book, he received a “Pass!”
I had done these drills until I was sick of them. I knew them all by heart and felt like a robot doing them.
Number of views:14220
Some of you may know that I was delivering NOTs and other standard Scientology Bridge actions in the field beginning in early 2010. My clients did well and some are still on my lines today, but as time went by, I began to see that although NOTs made my clients feel better, all of them were not becoming more spiritually aware.
Some were and still are grateful for the service I was delivering, but some were not really becoming more able to handle entities on their own. While working with one client who was experiencing body difficulties from the actions of an entity, I was surprised to hear her say, “I think he is trying to help me!” That started the process of discovery which resulted in Spiritual Rescue Technology.
I asked myself if beings were trying to help us, why should we be getting rid of them as so much garbage to be discarded? OT 3 and NOTs is all about getting rid of entities by any means possible. This is not auditing in any sense of the word, it is forced disconnection and some of you will know how that feels.
Spiritual Rescue Technology (SRT) is all about the methodology of rescuing beings from the incidents they are stuck in and bringing them to present time and putting them to work if they are interested in doing so. It was developed and is still being expanded with the help of dozens of friends and volunteers.
One of my new clients who knows SRT raised some questions on the differences between Scientology and Spiritual Rescue Technology. The answers may be enlightening to those of you who have not compared SRT and Scientology yet.
I have answered her questions on a point by point basis:
Number of views:118044